Andrew ([info]fangio) wrote,
@ 2009-02-12 12:28:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Restore my humanity!
I’m now certain that the constant exposure to news and information though the ever-growing forms of media has damaged us as much as it has educated us. I’ve learnt loads about animals, mega structures, catching Alaskan crab and modified cars through watching cable TV. I’ve kept my finger on the pulse of the economy and what’s going on in the world through Reuters News, the BBC and The Straits Times. Today, I listened to a news programme that jolted me in a big way. It made me realise how desensitised I have become due to the constant barrage of information.

Do you remember that Israel recently conducted a war against Hamas in Gaza? Probably. Do you remember when it started? Not likely. Do you know how many people died? I’m guessing not. I too can’t remember any of these details either. I remember thinking that its sad that there’s another war in that part of the world. I remember thinking that the war seemed very one-sided as well. But that’s about it.

I had to do a bit of work today that I’d loosely term ‘data management’. i.e. mind numbing work. So I put stuck some ear phones in my ears and decided to listen to the radio played from my phone to make time pass a little faster. I tuned straight into a BBC programme covering the after effects of the recent war. It only took a couple of seconds to latch onto the programme and realise what it was about.

Voice of the journalist – “And in this corner the room, lay the body of xxxxx, her body cut in half. And over here, yyyyy’s head got blown off by the sheer force of the explosion. You can still see some bits of brain stuck on the wall. This is where the children of Dr. zzzzz, a Palestinian, lost all his children. The Israeli army said Hamas militants were spotted in this house and fired a high-tech rocket into the building.”

This was followed by an interview of the said Palestinian doctor whose family had been wiped out from that attack. His voice was filled with extreme sorrow. It was painful to listen him recount the story of him returning home to find his children in pieces.

The journalist goes on to report on other accounts of civilian causalities in Gaza, other families being almost completely wiped out because they all were taking shelter together, of a hospital being evacuated because there was a white phosphorous artillery shell fired by the Israeli army burning in the middle of the street next to it. White phosphorous causes horrific burns that are difficult to heal. I remember reading how an elderly woman was treated for minor injuries caused by white phosphorous. She returned a few days later to the doctor and as those wounds did not heal and had eaten through to the bone. Use of white phosphorous in civilian areas during war is banned by the Geneva Convention. Its use as a smoke screen however, is not. That is how the Israeli army justifies its use.

Anyway, I digress. Listening to these actual accounts of people losing their lives, of a child describing how her relative was holding his son’s body while the brains were spilling out, is extremely disturbing. The hair on my back and arms stood for minutes on end after the programme ended. I then realized how desensitised I have become because of the never-ending barrage of media we expose ourselves to. The description of such news stories by an attractive looking blond woman on CNN, or pictureless pages in the newspaper somehow doesn’t quite convey the message or its impact properly, which is a real shame. Its scary that when I read about the war while it was happening, my only thought was “Hmm…. That’s rather sad.”

That radio programme restored a little bit of sensitivity to me. Its horrible that the rest of the world stood by while these horrible atrocities were committed. Myself included.



(7 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]hansel21
2009-02-12 06:28 am UTC (link)
Hey Andrew, I think I am somewhat torn about this whole Israel Gaza thing. On one hand, you have a country trying to protect its people from the constant barrage of attacks from random missile fire. On the other hand, you have civilians, being attacked, even when they are supposed to be in the safety of a UN shelter.

Is it possible that both are wrong? The only thing I cant figure out is how can anyone justify firing rockets on a daily basis into towns and cities inhabited by regular people.

Or maybe the whole Al Qaeda-holy war thing, how did we as a human race get accustomed to the fact that it is ok to hurt others in the name of our beliefs, and even worse, that its supposed to be in the name of God? (whichever God they believe in)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]undeadbydawn
2009-02-12 01:43 pm UTC (link)
just to pick a minor point here: it is important.

Hammas [very very stupidly] fired rockets over the border because they believed this would give them political leverage to demand Israel loosen off the border clampdown to led food and aid through. Bear in mind that Gaza is surrounded on all sides by Israel and the sea, and gets pretty much everything via the Israeli border. Israel has been a bit crappy with regards to letting stuff through.
In the early stages of the conflict, there were 3 Israeli deaths. There were thousands of Palestinian deaths, mostly civilian.

Now, a question. If you owned a mansion that was invaded by some other people who eventually forced you to live in a corridor and kept all the doors locked, so you had to ask for their permission to do anything *except* just stay quietly in the corridor, what would you do?

Would you quietly accept your new corridor existence and live peacefully, or would you fight back with every tool you could possibly find? That is the plight of the Palestinians. Israel is, in fact, the invading force. It just happens to have backup from some of the richest and most powerful people in the world who are mostly American.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]hansel21
2009-02-13 02:47 am UTC (link)
Hi Undeadbydawn. You've made a very good point and I agree with you.
Israel does have the US behind them and that almost seems ironic. Cos it basically means the US sits by doing nothing as a country invades another, but this is the same US that comes down hard on Iraq for invading Kuwait cos natural resources crucial to the US are at stake.

So like you, its not that I feel what the Palestinians are more right or wrong that the Israelis, I think this is once case where both parties are resorting to force and violence. Which certainly cant be right. But then again with the Champion of the free world behind you (the US), you cant do no wrong... right?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]undeadbydawn
2009-02-12 01:48 pm UTC (link)
I wish I was numb. I wish everything I read did not affect me, but it always does. I had to effectively ban myself from watching or reading anything regarding American politics for a while because it made me so damned angry. The conflict in Gaza was, and remains, rediculous and the lack of appropriate response worldwide early on made me utterly sick.

If you found that interesting I strongly urge you to read anything you can find by Robert Fisk. He's been the worlds top Middle East correspondent for decades and writes for the [UK] Independent newspaper. He isn't remotely impartial but his views are informed and accurate - he literally lives it, traveling through warzones, living with people on the ground and reporting what he experiences. Utterly indispensable.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2009-02-21 12:57 am UTC (link)
I'm a voyeur reader but I just felt that I had to make a comment here today.

to undeadbydawn: you say in the early stages of conflict, there were 3 Israeli deaths, but thousands of Palestinians dead.

Please try to understand why this is so. Hamas has been firing rockets into Israel for the past 8 years. These Qassam rockets are fired up to 100 a day, or 1 every 10 min.But the number of deaths in Israel remains low for a couple of reasons:

Firstly, the rockets are poorly engineered, which often means that they fall short. SEcondly, they lack a guidance system which means they are just fired into the general direction of Israel. Thirdly, Israel has in place an extrmeely well drilled civil response. Every citizen knows their nearest shelters, and every school and home has a safe place. Can you imagine having 15 seconds to run for shelther 100 times a day? That's what Israelites have been living with the past 8 years.

Israel's counter atttacks on Hamas yields this death toll because they have a vastly superior arsenal. Hamas has chosen a densely populated battle zone, so as to hide behind their civilians. Their leaders hide in hospitals acting as nurses.

Since when was a country's right to defend itself an issue of contention?

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2009-03-12 02:24 pm UTC (link)
you asked a very good Andrew.
when did it all start?
as im dearly passionate about the conflict between Israel and Palestine (i did my honours thesis on Political Islam and the Hamas government of Palestine, and am right now pursing my PhD specifically on Israel and Palestine), i really would like to send you the extended version of the conflict that i've recorded and written. But here's a brief.
1947 - mass genocide of Palestinians by Israel. Refugees have not been granted the "right of return to their homeland", a law stated by the UN Convention which Israel, the US and most government's foreign policy ignores.
1948 - state of Israel formed
1967 - 6-day war. Israel exteded their violence to neghbouring countries and whats left of Palestine.
thats a brief history.

When the state of Israel formed and till today, the boundaries of Israel have not been defined because Israel continues its settlement expansions, and daily military occupation of Palestine.

sure Palestine and the Hamas government have engaged in violence as well but it is important to understand (not justify) the roots of their violence through understanding the history of the conflict which the media strategically and conveniently neglects.

imagine if Singapore was forcefully taken over by X. we become refugees and not having the right of return which by international law applies to us refugees whose land was forcefully occupied. we watch our parents get shot infront of us. guess it's tough not to retaliate.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


(Anonymous)
2009-03-19 06:41 pm UTC (link)
i have nothing really new to say except that all loss of human life (civilian, military, children, teenagers, elderly) via bombings, rockets, war is regretful.

the history and complexity of the most recent conflict are worth noting. but violence begets violence and no one wins and no one will ever 'win'. every now and then, maybe someone gains a bit of land here and there, it gets covered with bloodshed fighting over it. an attempted peace settlement ensues, one side gives up the acreage for a much-needed but indefinite ceasefire.

re-play. lives are lost. families and homes are destroyed. people live in fear for their lives.

both sides must want a real end to that. neither should put up with civilian losses to gain international empathy or advance their political standing. War-like behavior should have an attainable or somewhat attainable goal, it cannot go on forever.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(7 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…